Indian Political Game Theory of 24

In the bipolar world the two great powers were in the parallel universe of geopolitics. The power of either great power was not consumed in the last two years. For the complex structure of geopolitics each of the great power was supposed to consume their power were supposed to consume their power anywhere in the hemispherical world. Consequently, the two major countries of the geopolitical world were used for the power consumption in the Geo-Structure of the politics United States and china, India and Pakistan, respectively. Optimists are still in their good state, but pessimists are not.

Indian fourth June election, uncovered that BJP prevails and democracy wins. The master mind pessimist Mr. Modi’s strategy wins democratic country three times in the parallel history of India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. As the world politics were turning to the multipolar with new shining stars Russia and India under the leading of the master minds. But Modi’s strategy fails due to his emphasis on his own brand and considering himself a dictator in the shining star of the multipolar world of politics.

Despite his strategy and struggles the democracy revealed that BJP prevails and democracy wins, but Modi has not showcased himself a goo democrat. The situations reflects that in the case of Modi fails but political structure wins, which testify the power consumption of united states of America in India, weather same in the case of china in Pakistan, on the contrary side the democratic country of the Russia Federation wins under the Putin’s leading both side of the politics.

Moreover the Indian’ election revealed that brands never wins the Geo-Economic world but political world. After the 4-June the Indian stock market price fall by 6% in the months of election, and predicted to be fall by 2% more which reflects the indirect decrease in the GDP of the country. As a result unintentional decrease in the in the international economic world the country’s most important part economic system suffers a lot due to the election, like wise agriculture, educational, and Job ratio. In the consequences the forefront party of the country will lose the position in the next coming election, which will provide a testifying state for the slogans of Mr.Modi  in the 4 – June election, “ABKI BAAR, 400 PAAR” and “ECONOMY – WORLD THIRD LARGEST BY 2027” .

As the days of the time running Mr. Modi’s started his struggling with coalition parties. On the other hand Mr. Modi tries to negotiate with his two prominent pawns, of Telgu Desan party and Janata Daal party, in the leading of chandarbabu Naidu and Deve Gowala respectively. But again he will testify himself to fail here too, because of the funds corruption case of the Naidu, and Hindu Nationalism problem of the Deve Gowala with modi, his environment were consecutively changed with consecutively three complete missions in the Indian democracy.

As the time reviles everything we will see that what we will see that what will do this intense negotiation state with India in the next couple of weeks. Right now the India needs leaders as the pessimists has not structural offices in the geo-politics. If Indian leaders remain leader so the will enter to the complex multipolar political structure but if they fails as a leaders they will fail to enter to the multipolar world.                       

          “In India’s June elections, democracy prevailed but leadership faltered. Modi’s brand survived the polls, yet failed to position India confidently within the rising multipolar geopolitical structure.”

Political Game Theory

Explore India’s 2024 elections in the context of global geopolitics. This analysis examines how Modi’s third-term victory signals a democratic win for India, yet reveals failures in leadership strategy amid shifting power structures between the U.S., China, Russia, and India. Understand how economic downturns and coalition challenges reflect India’s uncertain entry into the multipolar world.

3

India’s June 2024 elections reveal both the strength of its democracy and the strategic missteps of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Though BJP secured victory, Modi’s overemphasis on personal branding exposes cracks in India’s leadership amid the rise of a multipolar geopolitical world dominated by the U.S., China, Russia, and India. Falling markets, strained coalitions, and economic instability highlight India’s precarious path toward global influence. As coalition negotiations unfold, India’s true political future remains uncertain.